Signs in Arizona warn of smuggler dangers - Washington Times
The federal government has posted signs along a major interstate highway in Arizona, more than 100 miles north of the U.S.-Mexico border, warning travelers the area is unsafe because of drug and alien smugglers, and a local sheriff says Mexican drug cartels now control some parts of the state. more here.
And Obama is suing the State of Arizona and reporting it (a state in his own country - is the US really his country?) to the UN Human Rights Council (which spends its days and nights condemning Israel).
Who needs borders? Let there be one world, just like John Lennon sang, nothing to live or die for, just .... nothing.
Like Eurabia - let 'em in, anyone specially those with an ideology of world conquest and world rule.
That is Obama, he wants to replace the "system," to "change" it, to "fundamentally transform" it but has nothing to replace it with but some mumbo jumbo Marxist Black Liberation Theology. Sounds like he is a nihilist. He is pathetic, but he is extremely dangerous.
To have him in charge with Iran gunning towards nukes is a calamity.
And I've heard people in England say "oh but I wouldn't feel comfortable with Sarah Palin"!
Particularly for the Inter-Faith-Hopers-For-The-Besters and for those who, quite innocently, are taken in by the smooth sounding terms "Abrahamic faiths" or "Abrahamic civilization," I am setting out some reality below.
It is all part of Islamic deception in line with the teaching of the prophet of Islam of Islamic Taqiyya, or sacred deception ….
Sharia Law is readily obtainable in English. In applying Sharia law, or Islamic law, or Doctrinal Islam, or Muslim jurisprudence: NO Muslim can reject ANY part of Qur’an or the hadiths and remain Muslim (the alternative is becoming an apostate). Sharia is the EXCLUSIVE SOURCE of law for both Muslims and non-Muslims (the Infidel), and embraces ALL human activities – both personal and communal.
Sharia is understood as a series of duties and obligations; is not severable from Islamic theology; and as such it does not tolerate parties of differing opinion in its application. It exercises absolute and centralized control over ALL aspects of life. Islam does not consider itself to be the third Abrahamic faith, contrary to fond imaginings. It considers itself to be the only Abrahamic faith, the true faith of all the patriarchs and prophets, including Joseph and Abraham, and of which Judaism and Christianity are but falsifications and perversions. (Qur’an: 12:40; 48:28; 61:9; 16.52; 5:3; 9:33.) In other words, Islam is “the last religion”.
Bat Ye'or explained the scam by Islam and it's apologists very well:
Today, the laws of the ideology market are well known, as are the ways in which their global dissemination function. The anti-Zionism market returned to the anti-Jewish themes of the 1890-1945 period, substituting the word “Zionist” for “Jew.” As Jacques ellul had explained in his book on propaganda (1962), the myth “slips simply into the pre-existing mold and therein creates new beliefs.”88 In this way, the themes of Euro-Arab anti-Zionist propaganda were grafted onto a reflex reaction, previously conditioned by antisemitism. “Propaganda merely uses the existent material. It does not create it.”89
Just as the Judeo-Christian rapproachement was contested on the theological and political plane, the principle of a Judeo-Christian civilization in Europe had to be eliminated by producing and constantly propagating Judeophobia. Hamadi Essid, head of the Arab League Mission at Paris, and its permanent delegate to UNESCO, told a meeting in 1970: “For some time there has been a catch-phrase: “Judeo-Christian values”. The slogan is directed against the Arabs” [sic]90. The Arabs reject the term “Judeo-Christian civilization and replace it with “Abrahamic civilization,” because as Abraham was a Muslim according to the Koran, it follows that Western civilisation not only includes the Islamic dimension, but is Islamic in its essence.91
Notes:
88. Ellul, Propogandes, 268.
89..Ibid.,48. See Paul Giniewski, La Croix des Juifs (Geneva, 1994), chap.5.
90.Bruno Etienne, La France et l’islam (Paris, 1989), 180, without specifying place or date.
91. Muhammed Aqqad, The Muslim Foundations of European Civilization (Cairo) 1970.
Islam and Dhimmitude Where Civilizations Collide, by Bat Ye’or p. 296.
One finds, unsurprisingly, most of the usual clichés of Interfaith-Racketeering (Muslim-Christian and Muslim-Jewish Divisions) in M. Cherif Bassiouni’s response. For example, his passing allusion to “the three abrahamic faiths” -- a phrase that tells us nothing, because of course the “Abraham” of Islam is completely different from the Abraham of Judaism and Christianity, just as the Moses of Judaism, and the Jesus of Christianity, are very different from the versions of them -- Moussa and Isa -- to be found in Islam.
M. Cherif Bassiouni, Distinguished Research Professor of Law Emeritus and President Emeritus, International Human Rights Law Institute, DePaul University, knows this perfectly well. And he knows just how deceptive that “three abrahamic faiths” business is, just as that business of all “three monotheisms” is deceptive, for it implies that there is some benign relation between Islam and the two prior-in-time monotheisms. But while Christians and Jews do, as “People of the Book,” ahl al-kitab, receive special treatment -- they are allowed to stay alive, and even, under very onerous conditions of course, to practice their religions -- rather than being subject to immediate forcible conversion, or to death (as are those who are not “People of the Book”), their lives were, and obviously are, difficult under Islam. And that is why, over the centuries, many converted to Islam -- to avoid the difficult, and sometimes horrific conditions (which could include forcible mass conversions overnight, if a Muslim ruler took it into his head to insist upon it), including permanent physical insecurity, because a Muslim could kill a non-Muslim with impunity, and because, if even one member of a dhimmi community did not fulfill his duties -- say, did not pay the Jizyah -- the entire community could be punished.
The history of the non-Muslims under Islam, the history of the Dhimmi, has begun in modern times, thanks to the pioneering and lonely works of analysis and synthesis by Bat Ye’or, who recognized that this part of the history of Islamic conquest had been ignored. See, for example, the disgraceful scanting of the dhimmi in Bernard Lewis’s “The Middle East: the Last 2000 Years,” in which, in a volume of 400 pages, the dhimmi is mentioned in exactly three (consecutive) paragraphs, two of them exculpatory, with a great deal of vagueness about exactly what was demanded of the dhimmi (Christians and Jews under Islam, from ahl al-dhimma, or “the People of the [soi-disant] Pact”).
But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought.
[…]
This invasion of one's mind by ready-made phrases ...... can only be prevented if one is constantly on guard against them, and every such phrase anesthetizes a portion of one's brain.
Those who fall for the ""three Abrahamic faiths" business are obviously sufferering from the killer condition dhimmitude which of course includes having one's brain anethetized, ready for invasion.
Will he be encouraging talks with the jihadists when the UK's time comes as it must?
It already has, albeit at a low intensity, as we know, and the British authorities are talking, searching high and low for moderation in a sea of extremes.
The jihadist siege against Israel is merely somewhat further advanced than the jihad against the UK and is of course much more intense because:
Islam is reclaiming territory regarded as dar al Islam as it was conquered and is now dar al Harb and this takes a priority; and
Israel is "the Jews" and "the Jews" are and always will be first in line for islamic disaffection toward the "non-Muslim"kuffar
Tony Blair has played his part in the mess in Europe, by presiding over massive Muslim immigration, and is now doing big business with the Arabs - as a consultant:
Muslims are obliged to break their ("I'll make you an offfer you can't refuse") dhimma - pact/(treaty) with Jews and Christians if dhimmis under Muslim rule don't comply with Islamic Shari'ah or if Allah so decides and the Islamic Ruler obliges i.e. the Islamic Ruler has full discretion which means the dhimmi has NO legal rights only conceded rights.
Well, "the Jews" (Israel) have broken the dhimma according to Islamic Shari'ah by having the arrogance and impertinence to reside in their own historic homeland* and live under their own illicit non-Islamic Shari'ah law and under their own illegitimate kuffar government all of which which is an offence against Allah's divine law and Allah's divine will.
*The biblical land of Israel is denied as such by Islam which says that Mohammed was told by Allah that the Bible was falsified by "the Jews" who, by the way, also led the Christians, who falsified their Gospels, astray. The true word of God is the Holy Koran from Allah as "revealed" to the prophet of Islam, Mohammed. The true Jews, the good ones, few that there were, of ancient time were all Muslim. the biblical prophets were Muslim and Jesus was Muslim.
Speaking as a lawyer I detect lots of hearsay evidence about it all that would not stand up in a proper (non-Shari'ah) court of law. Yessiree.
There can only ever be a temporary peace in the valley with Muslims under the terms of their Islamic Shari'ah law and their treaties.
Anyone who doesn't know this is nuts or ignorant or a wishful thinker or bribed or just plain stupid - all this is well covered in one little known word:
We believe the song is haunting and beautiful, even if we do say so ourselves, and of course it can never do justice to the injustice that Muslims impose on "non-Muslims" in the belief, Jim Jones like, that they are acting in accordance with Allah's will, in accordance with Allah's divine Shari'ah law as "revealed" to the one Muslims believe is God's final prophet, Mohammed, the seal of the prophets, the one sent as God's Messenger to guide, teach and instruct not just his own people, but all "mankind," and also sent to warn all "mankind" that failure to follow Allah's commands are punishable by effective hell on earth and/or death and hellfire in the next life.
Take a listen:
Dhimmitude
The comprehensive legal system established by Muslim conquerors to rule native non-Muslim populations subdued by jihad. "Protection" money must be paid but non-Muslims have no legal rights.
I believe that it is a matter of life and death that that word, dhimmitude and what it means, becomes famous.
Tony Blair must and will be told, I'm sure. Who will do it?
"Racists, Islamophobes, far-right bigots"?
Or people who have studied, reluctantly, and know?
All dhimmis must be told.
How will the dhimmis react? Not kindly, I wouldn't think.
Geert Wilders calls people like him Shariah Socialists and Geert Wilders has been put on trial.
Everyone must be told and the Muslims must be told, the Muslims must be confronted.
The Muslims must be made aware that their mission to make 80% of the world's population who are not Muslim submit to them and to their god Allah, by persuasion or force, is a crime against their fellow human beings, a crime against humanity, that their mission to rule the world and all mankind is evil, that God did not tell them to do the terrible things they do in His name, that they have been misled by Mohammed or whoever wrote it all down
The truth hurts. But the truth is the only thing that can save civilization.
Israel should lead by telling the truth:
That it, like every "non-Muslim" country ("territory" to Islam) sooner or later, is up against jihad.
Jihad, Jihad, Jihad, Jihad.
And guess who is the force behind jihad? Yip Islam.
Not "radical islam" or "radical jihad" or extremists or hijackers of the peaceful, noble Islam etc., but Islam. Islam itself.
"...the concept of jihad…aims at the triumph of Islam, the extermination or conversion of pagans, and the conversion or humiliation of Jews and Christians.." (p.182.)
The above is an excerpt from Chapter 10 The Myth of Islamic Tolerance edited by Robert Spencer from an essay originally published by Bat Ye'or and now available on line at
By the way, that essay by Bat Ye'or is brilliant. I think the lady is a genius.
I have checked and rechecked these realities ever since 9/11.
I am sorry to say those are the facts. It is literally too terrible for words.
Jihad means never ever ending war until Islam conquers and rules the world and all mankind "in accordance with "Islamic Shari'ah" law.
See Islam's Declaration of ongoing jihad, ongoing war against all "mankind" who has not submitted, disguised in sly, deceitful legalese and condoned and accepted into the "Instruments" of the United Nations affording it international respectability.
We have produced a song about it - we think it's pretty good - I wonder what Elvis would say - I tell you one thing: I wish we could be singing about peace in the valley and good old love - wouldn't that be nice instead of spending all this time and energy on Islam.
Islam, Islam, Islam, Islam
But we have to, those who know must try and warn those who do not know.
It is our responsibility as human beings.
Life was nicer before, before we started making it our business to get to know.
Islam has taken over as the chosen people.
Our band WEAPON of MUSICAL DEFENSE has composed a song about this.
God Made Islam the Best Nation - So says the Islamic States' Human Rights Declaration from 1990.
The 1990 Declaration by 56 Islamic states says that all human rights and freedoms are subject to shari’ah. This, in total contradiction to the United Nations declaration, was acquiesced in and condoned by the U.N. How Come?
The sword of Damocles that hung over Prime Minister Netanyahu's head was withdrawal of American veto protection in the Security Council, a United States sitting on the sidelines in the General Assembly and the other U.N. bodies where new forms of anti-Israel censure are always percolating, and a firm U.S. no to any Israeli military effort to stop an Iranian nuclear weapon.
The article concludes:
Netanyahu apparently believes that falling on the sword erected by the Obama administration and his U.N. cohorts will buy him American goodwill. But this legal and political battle over what counts as legitimate self-defense needs to be fought like any other real war -- to win. Removing the fundamentals of self-defense from Israeli hands is at odds with the very raison d'etre of the Jewish state. This was one demand of a hostile American administration too many.
That part of the "international community" that is not Muslim is now being led by President Barack Hussein Obama to participate quite openly in the jihad against Israel ("the Jews").
In so doing that part of "international community" that is not Muslim is being led into commiting itself even more fully to acceptance of the jihad against itself, and thus ultimately to its own destruction by way of submission to Islam and "Islamic Shari'ah."
"By justifying the Palestinian jihad against Israel, Europe entered into a suicidal dynamic. The repudiation of Israel’s historical legitimacy and its replacement by a jihadist world order with its own Islamic conception of justice denies Europe’s own sovereignty and legitimacy. In the Islamic context, Palestinians incarnate jihadist ideology against infidels and Muslim replacement theology; whereas, in fact, Israel represents the liberation of the Jewish people from the yoke of dhimmitude."
So now, lead by the United States, the free world, and the not so free world, is entering into a full blooded "suicidal dynamic."
For the "Palestinians" read "Islamic Jihad."
All this for the sake of trying to appease this thing called jihad, which is a declaration of war on all "mankind," on all who do not submit to Islam.
And who and what is the force behind jihad?
Islam.
Here is the up to date Declaration of War by Islam (dressed up in legalese as a "human rights" declaration).
This is Islam's declaration of its continuing commitment to jihad, its commitment to the proposition that "mankind" has the "freedom and right to a dignified life in accordance with the Islamic Shari’ah" - only must be read into this - you know the way us lawyers operate.
So " mankind" has the "freedom and right to a dignified life" ONLY "in accordance with the Islamic Shari’ah"
The entire show is now online with English subtitles: parts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.
The entire show is interesting, with some very frank discussions between the students. During a discussion on sexual mores in German and Muslim cultures (AKA 'why German girls are sluts'), one of the Muslim students explained why Muslim boys won't have sex with Muslim girls.
Later, he explains why he feels discriminated.
The school was closed down at the end of this past school year and the students reassigned to other schools.
Rape in Islam: Missing Manchester girl plied with drugs and forced into prostitution
As Esmerelda posted yesterday, these Muslims criminals were described by the BBC Radio 4 as "Asians."
What an insult and how pathetic and dishonest is the lying BBC.
An explanation as to the state of mind of these particular rapists and pimps may be gleaned from Bill Warner's explanation that in Islam "as long as" the woman "is a non-Muslim captive or slave... rape...is not a crime because it is jihad."
RAPE?
Muslims had sex with the captive women after battles. This is reported in the Sira and many times in the Hadith and approved in the Koran.
But is this rape? In jihad, it is not rape to have forced sex with a woman, even if she is married, as long as she is a non-Muslim captive or slave. A Muslim does not commit rape if the woman is a non-Muslim, only if she is a Muslim. Again Islam presents dual ethics.
Forced sex with women after their protectors have been killed is supreme domination. It also humiliates male relatives and husbands who were not killed. If it is followed by capture and relocation to the captor’s environment, it usually results in a totally compliant woman who has been forced to submit. Forced sex with women was an ancient method of war because it worked. If the woman’s children were raised as Muslims, the domination ensured cultural and familial annihilation. Still in practice today, forced sex is far more than rape; it is a method of war, a tactical strike. Naturally, it is not a crime because it is jihad. It is not a sin because it is sanctioned in the Trilogy of the Koran, the Sira and the Hadith
MUHAMMED, ALLAH AND THE JEWS
Page 251-252
CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF POLITICAL ISLAM VOLUME 5
Yes jihad.
Now wouldn't it be in everyone's best interests, including the best interests of those who believe in this as their law,for the reality to be told by one and all. Only then can progress be made. The good people among the Muslims will surely come round to the view that such law is not your ordinary law, it is criminal law i.e. Islam exhorts its followers to commit acts which are criminal by the standards and more importantly, THE LAW of societies which are not ruled according to Islamic law.
The truth must be told.
In Islam rape "is not a crime because it is jihad."
As I keep on repeating Shari'ah affords no legal rights for the "kafir" (kufr in Arabic politically corrected to "non-Muslim") and this of course applies to women.
Very much so. Only male Muslims have equal rights under Islamic Shari'ah. Muslim women have limited rights and "non-Muslims"no rights, none, none whatsoever.
If he smokes maybe the Archidiot of Canterbury should put those legal realities in it and smoke it, smoke it.
A thought. The Archbishop of Shari'ah probably doesn't smoke. He probably figured out its bad for his health.
Maybe even he could figure out the implications of no legal rights for "non-Muslims."
Mobs of Kyrgyz men rampaged through southern Kyrgyzstan today, slaughtering ethnic Uzbeks and burning down houses in a third day of ethnic bloodshed.
The country's interim government granted its security forces shoot-to-kill powers and promised to send a volunteer force to the region – but the violence continued to rage, taking the death toll since Thursday night to more than 100.
At least 1,100 have been wounded in what are the country's worst ethnic clashes in 20 years.
More than 75,000 terrified ethnic Uzbeks, mostly women and children, flooded across the nearby border with Uzbekistan today. Many of the refugees had gunshot wounds, according to the Uzbek emergencies ministry.
Gunfire could still be heard in the southern city of Osh, Kyrgyzstan's second city, and witnesses described scenes of horror and panic.
"God help us … they are killing Uzbeks like animals. Almost the whole city is in flames," Dilmurad Ishanov, an Uzbek human rights worker, told Reuters by telephone.
Much of the city was left in ruins after fires set by rioters swept through Uzbek areas, while the few remaining members of the city's large Uzbek minority barricaded themselves in against Kyrgyz gangs...
Of course we find that according to the CIA Factbook, Muslims are the majority - see below - so presumably Muslims are doing the killing or rather defending themselves against people who resist submitting or dying. --The Law
MEMRI - Flotilla "We Felt Like We Were Going on an Islamic Conquest or Raid"
The leaders, political, religious, civic, community, the lot, and the media who ignore all this, and that is all of them, bar a few, are all culpable.
They are complicit in the war (jihad) against Israel and "the Jews" and are in fact collaborating with "Islamic Shari'ah" * and are in turn facillitating the war (jihad) against their own people, against themselves.
These leaders are like collective reverse Moses' leading their people into slavery, into submission, little by little, into submission to "Islamic Shar'ia."
Extract: "In effect, the dhimmi is halfway between freedom and slavery, a semi-slave."
The leaders should instead be seeking keep their flocks free and helping those who are struggling to remain free, succeed in so remaining, even though most don't fully appreciate the significance of the assault on everyone's freedom by Islam. These leaders should be helping those who are not free find their promised land, their freedom.
Freedom is not the freedom to submit to "Islamic Shari'ah" or die, as Islam would have it.
That is how "Islamic Shari'ah" "law" defines freedom.
PA TV broadcast kids singing anti-Israel war song to terrorist who aided suicide bomber
Nuts.
Those who ignore what the leaders of Islam say day in and day out are twits, dangerous twits, or much worse, they areproponents of the jihad themselves.
These leaders are in effect aiding and abetting in the commission of treason. Some may be commiting treason themselves.
* "Islamic Shari'ah." The bang up to date proclamation of the jihad intention by Islam,is there, accepted in the United Nations as large as life, proclaimed literally from the rooftops, but do you ever seen it mentioned?
It declares Islam's intention, Islam calling, Islam's mission;
To Conquer and Rule the World and all "Mankind" and not rest for one minute until everything and everybody is ruled "in accordance with the Islamic Shari'ah."
This intent is thinly disguised, however, in legal camouflage, in legalese.
This mission is the same it has been since the establishment of Islam 14 centuries ago.
It is pathetic but it is lethal. It is evil.
The methodolgy which Islam has developed in exquisite detail in order to fulfill the mission is called jihad.
The Islamic "Declaration on Human Rights" is actually a Declaration of Jihad, it is an "invitation" to Islam but does not state the "or else" that is implicit in all such Islamic "invitations."
Adopted and Issued at the Nineteenth Islamic Conference of Foreign Ministers in Cairo on 5 August 1990. The Member States of the Organization of the Islamic Conference,
Reaffirming the civilizing and historical role of the Islamic Ummah which God made the best nation that has given mankind a universal and well-balanced civilization in which harmony is established between this life and the hereafter and knowledge is combined with faith; and the role that this Ummah should play to guide a humanity confused by competing trends and ideologies and to provide solutions to the chronic problems of this materialistic civilization.
Wishing to contribute to the efforts of mankind to assert human rights, to protect man from exploitation and persecution, and to affirm his freedom and right to a dignified life in accordance with the Islamic Shari’ah
[…]
Article 24 ?All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Shari'ah.
Article 25 ?The Islamic Shari'ah is the only source of reference for the explanation or clarification to any of the articles of this Declaration.
This Declaration was condoned and accepted by the UN in 1997 (Mary Robinson, recipient last year of a Presidential Medal of Freedom Award from President Obama, was in charge at the time - I suppose "diversity" would cover it - or, rather perhaps, blind, even willful, ignorance) on the basis of the need for "a greater need for an understanding of Islam."
Well "submit or die" is the proposition when one cuts through all the detail. Now that is easy to understand and fulfills the need, the "greater need for an understanding of Islam."
There it is.
The indefatigible David Littman provides details of how the United Nations came to accept this Islamic "Declaration on Human Rights" and the implications:
JANUARY 19, 2003 2:00 P.M.
Human Rights and Human Wrongs Sharia can’t be an exception to international human-rights norms.
"Islam was indigenous to Europe since the 8th century" says OIC head. "Indigenous by Jihad conquest" says a lawyer.
"In fact, Islam was indigenous to Europe since the 8th century," he said, pointing to the Muslim presence on the Spanish peninsula."
--The head of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu.
Just like Islam was "indigenous" to "Palestine" and all the other territories it invaded soon after it burst out of Arabia (Saudi Arabia today) and raped, pillaged, plundered, conquered, colonised and ruined the then indigenous people of more than 100 civilizations.
So Islam is "indigenous" to Europe by virtue of its aggressive war of conquest, jihad, which is ongoing, and can never end till all the world submits to rule by Muslims in accordance with Islamic Shari'ah.
Indigenous by jihad conquest.
The whole story is so pathetic. A child lawyer possessed of the facts could cross examine any defender of the faith of Islamand reduce him/her to a withering wreck.
Wouldn't it be luverly?
People lose their lives and their freedom for such rubbish. It is sickening.
From Esther posted to Islam in Europe at 5/06/2010 07:44:00 AM
Vienna: Burqa bans are 'un-European', says OIC head
Bans on burqas are "very un-European," the head of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC), Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, said Thursday in Vienna, calling on Europeans to honour the values of tolerance and freedom.
Belgium's parliament approved a draft law banning the wearing of full-length veils last Thursday, while similar rules have been drafted in France and in a Swiss canton.
"We have been always listening and learning and reading that Europe is a continent of freedoms, not of bans," the Secretary General of the group of 57 Islamic countries said.
"This is very un-European in my understanding," he told the German Press Agency dpa.
Ihsanoglu was in Vienna to address a meeting of the Organization for Co-operation and Security in Europe.
The Turkish OIC head stressed that burqas are nothing Islamic but a traditional dress worn in some areas. "I personally don't like it," he said.
In his address to OSCE envoys, Ihsanoglu lamented that many Europeans consider Islam alien to European culture and society. "In fact, Islam was indigenous to Europe since the 8th century," he said, pointing to the Muslim presence on the Spanish peninsula.
Former US General, Paul Vallely, Warns of Chemical Attacks Against Israel
Former US Major General Paul Vallely comments on potential Hezbollah war plans against Israel: possible preemptive attacks on Israeli air fields this summer, SCUD missles with 450 km range, tunnels from Lebanon into Israel, Russian submarine with Iranian flag in Lebanon, and possible chemical attacks against Israel
Wouldn't he be wonderful as a Shariah judge? But he'd have to convert to Islam first. Or maybe the OIC would do something special for him. He must be a really charming man. -- The Law From the Jerusalem Post:
Man who headed Cast Lead c'tee reportedly served as apartheid judge.
Jurist Richard Goldstone was responsible for sending at least 28 black South Africans to death when they appeared before him during the apartheid regime, Yediot Aharonotreported Wednesday.
According to the report, Goldstone, who headed the UN committee which investigated alleged war crimes perpetrated by the IDF during Operation Cast Lead in Gaza, handed down the sentences while serving as a judge in the South African Court of Appeals.
Goldstone presided during the 1980s and 1990s, and wrote in one of his rulings that the gallows are the only deterrent for killers.
However, he responded to the report by saying that he was a part of the system and had to respect the laws of the state, occasionally having to enforce laws he was opposed to.
The former judge was also responsible for sending four men accused of violent acts to receive lashes alongside the upholding of other racist laws, Yediot Aharonot said.
The punishment of those who wage war against God and His Apostle, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter;
The photos show "hands and feet" cut off and of course the fact of the "execution" of the victims is evidenced by theheads. The legal justification or reasoning for the cutting of heads can be found in that verse 5:33 ("execution") and specifically in relation to heads for example in Sura 47.04 and in many other places.
Sorry about the pictures, but it is better to know.
This is an issue of law, "Islamic Shari'ah" law.
This is "Islamic Shari'ah" law applied.
This law is what Islam, yes Islam, not just "extremists," has declared that it wishes to be applied to all "mankind" in its take on human rights:
Wishing to contribute to the efforts of mankind to assert human rights, to protect man from exploitation and persecution, and to affirm his freedom and right to a dignified life in accordance with the Islamic Shari’ah.
Is this type of law, and law it is, permissible on any statute books.
Now I am not saying that all Muslims believe in cutting off bodyparts or approve of this, I am simply saying that this is what their "Holy Book" says.
Muslims are saddled with this law and so are kafirs.
Everybody on earth is hostage to this and to the declared proclamation by Islam that freedom means only freedom to live "in accordance with Islamic Shari'ah."
The meaning of Sura 5:33 couldn't be clearer.
The results are there for all to see.
Those people, Muslim and kafirs ("Non-Muslims" is a politically corrected term, one should never tire of repeating) who apologise for Islam in any way, are also responsible for this particular horror and for the future horrors, because they are helping obscure the harsh reality.
Oh yes, and just imagine the cutters off of hands, feet and heads in possession of nuclear weapons.
President Obama will be taking advice from which of his advisers on how to talk to such people while respecting their culture and their way of life...and their way of death?
Stewart Jackson Reports Truthfully on Afghanistan and ...
A 'kill the messenger' type of story:
Peterborough’s Labour candidate Ed Murphy takes Stewart Jackson, Conservative shadow communities and local government minister, to task for reporting the contents of a briefing he received on Afghanistan. Murphy wanted Jackson to retract the comments on the grounds that there are "around 8,000 Muslim voters in this constituency." --The Law
Allister Hayman, Tory renewal spokesman in row over Afghan Muslim 'initiation rites' comments, Regen.net, 20 April 2010.
A Tory shadow minister for communities and local government has said that young Muslim men in Afghanistan perform rape and shootings as part of 'initiation rites'.
Stewart Jackson, Conservative shadow communities and local government minister and the party’s regeneration spokesman, was reported by audience members and rival parliamentary candidates to have told a public meeting organised by Peterborough Senior Citizens Forum last month that, in Afghanistan, "fifteen year old Muslim boys’ initiation rites are to rape a woman and shoot a foreigner".
Jackson, who is the sitting MP in Peterborough, confirmed to this magazine that he had made the comments. But he said that the comments were made in reference to the situation on the ground in Afghanistan. He said they were "100 per cent" not his personal opinion but rather a view expressed in a briefing he had received on Afghanistan from the Ministry of Defence (MoD).
He said: "During a public discussion I referred to claims made at an MoD briefing on the situation in Afghanistan, this was part of a serious debate about complex issues and I hope no one is using it to try and score political points."
But a MoD spokeswoman said that such a description of the situation in Afghanistan would be a complete departure from normal MoD practice. She said: "I can’t say that nobody from the MoD has ever said that but that is not the sort of thing we would ever say in an average MoD briefing".
Peterborough’s Labour candidate Ed Murphy, who was sitting on the panel with Jackson, said he had asked Jackson to retract the comments, but Jackson had refused. "[Jackson] said he had been to Afghanistan and knew what was going on", Murphy said. "We have around 8,000 Muslim voters in this constituency and I felt the comments were deeply inappropriate."
The Liberal Democrat candidate, Nick Sandford, also said that he had been "surprised" by the quote.
Murphy put Regeneration & Renewal in touch with two Peterborough Senior Citizens Forum members that had attended the meeting.
Mary Cook, 72, of Orton Goldhay in Peterborough, said she found Jackson’s comments "surprising". "I thought he had gone a bit over the top," she said.
John Green, 68, of Bretton, Peterborough, who asked the question of the candidates of the three main parties at the hustings that Jackson was addressing, said he thought the "initiation rites" allegation reflected the Tory MP’s own opinion. "He said it was part of the culture, over there in Afghanistan, and he knew that because he'd been there," he said.
Community cohesion and immigration has become a pressing issue in the Peterborough campaign, Murphy said, particularly after the national press had reported that the city faced problems with migrant communities.
A Conservative Party spokeswoman said the comments were "absolutely not [Jackson’s] personal view" and that no one from the Conservative Party’s shadow communities and local government team would hold such views.
She said it was "disingenuous" to suggest that Jackson’s comments were anything other than a reflection of an MoD briefing. But she declined to provide details of the briefing that Jackson received from the MoD, on the grounds that it was private.
Muslims in Swiss Army get special treatment, special privileges -- see here.
The new army recruits will, if history is anything to go by, be assisting their brother Muslims in due course in plundering all assets, if what is happening is allowed to happen.
The Swiss have a duty of care towards all their citizens and of course to all those overseas clients with assets held in trust in Swiss banks.
So the bankers should have their expensive lawyers read up what Islamic law says about assets which belong (for the time being until Allah's will is fulfilled) to kafirs ("Non-Muslims" is a politically corrected term one should never tire of repeating):
Booty
All territory taken from infidels became the property (fay) of the state. It formed, henceforth, the dar al-Islam, land administered by Islamic law for the benefit of Muslims and their descendants.31 This principle, established by the Arab conquest, introduced a political and legal dogma rooted in theology.
These possessions received the name of fay since Allah had taken them away from the infidels in order to restore (afa’a, radda) them to the Muslims. In principle, Allah has created the things of this world only in order that they may contribute to serving him, since he created man only in order to be ministered to. Consequently, the infidels forfeit their persons and their belongings which they do not use in Allah’s service to the faithful believers who serve Allah and unto whom Allah restitutes what is theirs; thus is restored to a man the inheritance of which he was deprived, even if he had never before gained possession of it.32
Notes
33.Donner, The Early Islamic Conquest, 226, 231-33, 237-38, 265-66; Abu Yusuf, Le livre de Limpot foncier, 37-61; Abraham N. Poliak, “L’Arabisation de l’Orient Semitique,” REI 12 (1938): 35-63; Ashtor, A Social and Economic History, 22-26.
32.Ibn Taymiya, in Laoust, Le Traite de droit public, 35-36; Abu Yusuf, Le Livre de l’imp?t foncier, 36-43; Morony, Iraq, 106-17. For the property of infidels destined to become booty, see the opinion of the Andalusian jurist Ibn Hazm (eleventh century), in Arnaldez, “La Guerre Sainte,” 2:457: “God has established in the infidels ownership of their property only for the institution of booty for Muslims.” The concept of fay is linked to war and its practices: see Kitab al-Kharaj from Qudama b. Ja’far, in Ben Shemesh, Taxation in Islam, 2:25-27: “If the Imam distributes the lands among those who captured them, they become ‘ushr lands, and their previous owners become slaves. If he does not distribute the lands but leaves them in whole, as a trust to the Muslims, then the poll tax lies on the necks of their owners, who are free, while their lands are changed with kharaj tax. This is the view of Abu Hanifa.”
Quoted in Islam and Dhimmitude Where Civilizations Collide by Bat Ye’orpp. 59-60.
Hmmm "..as a trust to the Muslims."
It sounds crazy but it is fact. That is Islamic law.
In Islamic law it is quite clear.
The fancy bankers and traders will find that all their fancy bonuses and fancy houses and apartments are in fact not theirs. It all belongs to "the Muslims."
Is this too complicated for the bankers, and their lawyers to understand?
There are many lawyers in Switzerland who specialise in trust law.
Do people not care?
The leaders in Europe and worldwide have lost their minds to facillitate the dismantling of Europe as it appears obvious they have done and continue to do.
Europe is rapidly becoming Eurabia.
It will surely lead to some kind of civil war and, presumably general war.
The Swiss are hoping for business as usual.
It cannot be business as usual. Business is being hijacked. Freedom is being hijacked.
As a by the by, if Jerusalem, or as one would say in law, "or part thereof," is Muslim what does that make London, Paris, Washington, Rome etc., oh yes and Zurich and Geneva, and Basle and Bern and Lausanne and [filll in the space], or parts thereof?
Istanbul was Constantinople. Now the whole thing is Muslim (not just "part thereof').
President Barack Hussein Obama is making the United States look like Ali Baba and the Appeasers, Bowers and Submitters. ABABS.
Time for some quick sobering up.
It is happening very, very fast.
At some stage the general public is going to find out the truth about Islam, that it is primarily a political movement with the mission commanded by the one and only God, who Muslims believe to be Allah, to conquer and rule the world.
That is Islamic law.
It is not a question of "moderation."
It is a question of fact and it is a question of law and you know what they say, "the law is the law."
It is likely that the public will find out that the leaders of Islam use religion as a tool to facilitate Islam's objective of world conquest and rule.
Unless one believes in Allah and Mohammed as his prophet then a quick read of Islamic history shows that Mohammed created Islam as a tool first to conquer and rule his own tribe. Mohammed achieved his objective and then in the words of W.H.T Gairdener an Arab linguist and scholar who wrote a brilliant essay in 1919 called Mohammed Without Camouflage:
Later on, as success grew, the object of the Holy War became the right to worship at the Ka'ba in the way of Islam. And finally, or course, it became the conquest of Arabia (and later the whole world) for Islam.
When the public realises that "peace" in Islam means submission to Allah's will and that it is Allah's will that all "mankind" be ruled according to "Islamic Shari'ah" law and that this law afford "non-Muslims" no legal rights one suspects that there will be great anger.
Islam's ideology since inception has been world conquest and rule of all "mankind .... in accordance with Islamic Shari'ah" (CDHRI*) which law affords us kafirs (Non-Muslims is a is a politically corrected term) no legal rights whatsoever. None, not even the right to life and no right to property.
I'll say it again:
No legal rights for kafirs under Islamic Shari'ah.
Why is no one saying this?
I'll say it again:
No legal rights for kafirs under Islamic Shari'a.
Yes, when the public realise that, then anything can happen.
December 15, 1974: Michael Parkinson sees Muhammad Ali turn from clown into avenging angel of Islam. From the archive of The Times:
IT HAS always been my contention that the television studio is the wrong place for an intimate and revealing talk with someone — hideously subtitled “the in-depth interview”. Apart from the fact that a studio sticky with lights and festooned with electronic apparatus is hardly a relaxing atmosphere, the interviewee is unlikely to reveal all with a microphone up one nostril and a camera in his left ear.
The most the television interviewer can do is to allow the interviewee to develop his personality on the air, to persuade him to be relaxed in strange, unconvivial surroundings so that he or she might unbend enough to offer the viewer an insight into their real being.
Occasionally, and only very occasionally, something else happens and television shows you a part of a man’s personality in a naked light and the result is startling and disturbing. Such an event occurred last week when I interviewed Muhammad Ali.
For a while he had been the Ali we all know and most of us love, the clowning, funny heavyweight champion of the world.
Then I produced a book written by Budd Schulberg, the American journalist and author, called Loser and Still Champion. The book, written after Ali’s defeat by Joe Frazier, is one of the best eulogies ever written about any sportsman. Indeed, Schulberg was one of the most prominent agitators for Ali’s return to boxing after the fighter had been banned during the draft issue. Moreover, Ali had inscribed the book “To Budd Schulberg. You’re my man”.
In the book Schulberg listed the contradictions apparent to anyone who has ever thought about Ali. I repeated one of them, the fact that although Ali belonged to a religious sect that preached the white man was a devil, he had more white friends than any other black fighter Schulberg had known.
It can be said, without fear of contradiction, that at this point Ali blew his stack...
This article by ex-Muslim ali Sina is authoritative and informative.
It's the most ridiculous claim one could ever have made in history...
Dear Mr. Sina,
Muslims claim their religion is the oldest and only the truth and all human beings are born as Muslims but practice religion according to their upbringing. They claim people “revert” back to Islam and not convert to it. Could you please elaborate on this?
Muslims love lies. They live in perpetual self delusion. The claim that people are born Muslims and then indoctrinated into other faith is a ridiculous claim. If all children were born Muslim then one should see people who are not indoctrinated in any religion, would want to naturally believe in Islam. But this is not happening. In fact there is resistance and as the result Muslims try to sugarcoat Islam with 1001 lies to make it more palatable.
Also we are witnessing that even those who were indoctrinated in Islam leave it once they come to learn the unadulterated truth about it. The fallacy of this claim is self evident.
Islam is not a continuation of previous religions. Muhammad plagiarized heavily from the Old Testament, but the Islamic god and the biblical god are two very distinct deities, something that perhaps Muhammad himself did not know.
Originally, Muhammad tried to link himself to biblical prophets to bait the Jews and Christians of Arabia. He even used Jerusalem as his Qibla, but he presented no proof for his bogus claim and stopped talking so much about Biblical stories once he saw the so called people of Book do not buy his charade.
There is no mention of Muhammad in the Bible, except when Jesus warned his follower of false prophets. Jesus said you will recognize them by their fruits. Look at Muhammad’s fruits? Did he live a holy life? He was a despicable thug. He raided, raped and butchered innocent people and looted their belongings. This is enough for any sane person to know he was a false prophet. So why over a billion people think he was a prophet? The key word is “sane.” When it comes to beliefs people lose their sanity. They pride themselves in their foolishness and berate intelligence. Muslims leave their shoes and their brains outside the mosque.
Muslims say Islam is the natural religion. Imagine how preposterous this claim is. If it is natural why Muhammad established the institution of jihad? Why Islam should be spread by the sword? People would intuitively believe in a natural religion. Why force them? There is nothing natural in Islam. This faith is stupid and counterintuitive. Muhammad tricked people with the fear of hell and the promise of virgins, pearly boys (goodness gracious) and gardens with rivers of wine. The rituals of Islam are all unnatural. What these silly postures in prayer have to do with spirituality and worshipping? If these were natural people all over the world should know them intuitively, but they don’t and they have to be indoctrinated. Sex is natural. Getting hungry is natural. Getting angry under duress is natural. Believing in a higher power when you face a major problem is natural. But believing in the nonsense of Islam and its sadistic god of vengeance is not natural.
Fasting damages the health and makes one edgy. It is not natural and it does not make one spiritual. Muslims are most dangerous during the month of Ramadan. In this month they become beasts. These were the rituals of pagan Arabs whom Muhammad called ignorant, but copied their rites nonetheless. Now, thanks to Islam the practices of those ignorant people are practiced by Muslims all over the world.
Muslims claim Adam and all other prophets were Muslims. Where is the proof? The burden of proof is on them. Muslims confuse claim with evidence. They think Muhammad’s claim constitutes proof. This is the level of intelligence of these people who now want to dominate the world.
Islam has no relationship with Biblical religions. Unlike what Muslims think, Arabs worshiped Allah at least 2500 years before Muhammad. Muhammad’s father and many other Arabs were called Abdullah before Islam.
The Moon God
In the Ka’ba, there was a moon god called Hubal. This deity was the chief of all gods lodged in that pantheon. He was also referred to by his titleal ilah (the god). Al lah is the short version of al ilah. In Arabic the definitive article joins the noun to form a single word allah. Allah is not a proper name. It is like calling the president of a country by his title, “the president”, but the president is not a proper name. Also in Arabic there is not capitalization of the proper name. Europeans capitalized the first letter of allah as it was already assumed to be a proper name.
There is no better evidence than the crescent placed over Muslim minarets that al ilah refers to Hubal the moon god of the Arabs.
Wikipedia says “Hubal was claimed to be a moon god, worshipped in Arabia, notably at Mecca before the arrival of Islam.”
Muslims deny that Hubal is the same Allah. If so, what is the meaning of the crescent in Islam? The evidence is overwhelming. Allah refers to Hubal. Hubal is the proper name of “the god”(al lah) that Muslims worship. ..
If allah was a proper name and the same as Yahweh, why there is no mention of Allah in the Old and the New Testaments? It is preposterous to say the Biblical prophets were Muslims and believed in al lah of the Arabs.
Many rituals of Islam such as the postures during salaat, fasting during the month of Ramadan, ablution, tayyammum and hajj with all its rituals from circumvallating counter clockwise seven times about the Ka'ba, kissing the Black Stone, running back and forth between the hills of Al-Safa and Al-Marwah, drinking from the Zamzam Well, going to the plains of Mount Arafat and Stoning of the Devil, are relics of the Pagan religion of the Arabs. The shaving of heads, the animal sacrifice and Eid al-Adha are also pagan rituals. These rituals were not practiced or taught by any of the Biblical prophets that according to Mohammedans were Muslims. If they were Muslims why they did not pray as Muslims do or perform any of the rituals that they perform? Didn’t Muhammad say that these rituals of the pillars of Islam? How is it that Biblical prophets, who according to Muhammad were Muslims never performed these rituals?
The story that Ka’aba was built by Abraham is a myth. Why that old man would travels hundreds of kilometers with a new born baby to abandon his wife and his child in the middle of desert? Furthermore, the Bible says that Ismail, Hagar’s son, was a young man abusing his much younger brother Issac in Canaan. How could that happen if he was left in Mecca? There are plenty of holes in the Islamic narrative.
Those who translated the Bible to Arabic used the word allah to denote God. If by this they meant nothing more than al ilah (the God) then it’s correct. Just as several persons can be called the president, gods can be called al lah. When the Bible mentions allah it is referring to al ilah Yahweh and when the Quran talks about allah, it is referring to al ilah Hubal. Allah is a title. It means ‘the god’. It can be any god.
The Bible mentions al lah of Arabs by his name. Hubal is the same Baal of the Moabites. It is the Arabic for the Hebrew HaBaal, "the Baal.”
Muhammad never mentioned Hubal by his name. That is because everyone called Hubal by his title. When the British say ‘the Queen’, they know whom they are talking about. Elizabeth and the Queen are not two different persons. Likewise, Hubal is name of al ilah Arabs were invoking.
Muslims have to look no further than the ubiquitous crescent to know whom they are worshipping. The crescent is the smoking gun.
I hope this answers your question.
Ali Sina
An understanding of this issue helps towards the realization that Islam is a replacement ideology to replace all other religions this to be by peaceful persuasion or force.
There is no way round this. This is the mission and this is the goal.
All the other stuff about violence in the Bible (Kitman is the name for that particular Islamic deception), the crusaders, the inquisition, imperilaism, colonialism, Bush, "the Jews," the This, the That and Ali The Other, is all nonsense, but nonsense which many, many people believe or are forced to "respect."
World conquest and world rule. That is it. Immutable it.
The Auschwitz Album is the only surviving visual evidence of the process of mass murder atAuschwitz-Birkenau. It is a unique document and was donated to Yad Vashem byLilly Jacob-Zelmanovic Meier.
The photos were taken at the end of May or beginning of June 1944, either by Ernst Hofmann or by Bernhard Walter, two SS men whose task was to take ID photos and fingerprints of the inmates (not of the Jews who were sent directly to the gas chambers). The photos show the arrival of Hungarian Jews from Carpatho-Ruthenia. Many of them came from the Berehovo Ghetto, which itself was a collecting point for Jews from several other small towns.
The photos in the album show the entire process except for the killing itself. Click here to view.
"New opportunities for dialogue, mutual understanding and coexistence"
The Italian capital, Rome will open its first supermarket halal meat counter on Saturday, where Muslims will be able to buy meat slaughtered according to Islamic principles as well as other halal products.
Imams from mosques in Rome, Florence and Ravenna will attend the inauguration at the Ipercoop supermarket in the southern Casilina area of Rome, where traditional Arab dishes will also be served.
Muslim immigrants and converts can buy meat at halal butchers, but haven't been able to find it in supermarkets, and halal meat counters could help integrate Muslims in Italy, according to some.
"This is a chance to understand each other better and find new opportunities for dialogue, mutual understanding and coexistence - even inside a supermarket," the organisers of Saturday's event said in a statement posted to the Italian interfaith websiteildialogo.org.
What an opportunity - to dialogue and understand and coexist with no rights for kafirs* (Koran's term for rejecters and miscreants i.e. all who are guilty of not "accepting" Allah and Islam - I'm not kidding). See:
I'm not sure what the difficulty is in understanding that under "Islamic Shari'ah" kafirs have NO LEGAL RIGHTS.
Under the new laws of Europe, which are starting to incorporate elements of "Islamic Shari'ah," understanding and knowing that, and speaking out against it, makes one a potential criminal while the leaders, political, religious and communal, insist on endless dialogue to "understand" Islam.
The end product of this stupidity is submission to Islam.
That gradual submission, which Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch has named as Stealth Jihad, is in accelerating progress because part of "Islamic Shari'ah" is that it is a sacrilege** to be critical of any part of Allah's perfection and that includes "islamic Shari'ah" - what you might call closing the circle.
If the kafirs don't wake up and start to unseat the leaders and replace them with people who understand the difference between right and wrong, and halal and kosher or the right to just be, the future will be too terrible for words.
There is no sign of that - just more of the same.
Israel and "the Palestinians" and the PA, PLO, Hamas, and Hezbolallah and Islamic Jihad and "Al Qaida" and Al This, Al That and All The Other, are just red herrings.
Wishing to contribute to the efforts of mankind to assert human rights, to protect man from exploitation and persecution, and to affirm his freedom and right to a dignified life in accordance with the Islamic Shari’ah
* "non-Muslims" is a PC'd term imposed on the unsuspecting public by deluded leaders, many of whom are crazed, addicted appeasers who are either bribed, ignorant, insane or stupid because they insist on looking for good when there is only a political movement to conquer and rule the world, and do all this with extreme violence and menace.
Brown University C.V. Starr Foundation Lectureship
Salomon Hall Room 001
Excerpt
I call dhimmitude the comprehensive legal system established by the Muslim conquerors to rule the native non-Muslim populations subdued by jihad wars. It is my opinion that this system has not been fully investigated. However, one can rightly ask:
[…]
As a brief conclusion, I would say that there is no public debate yet on the ideology of jihad against the infidels, nor about dhimmitude, because these subjects are simply obfuscated or denied outright. Thus, Dr. Abdel-Mo’ti Bayoumi, the Secretary of the Islamic Center of the prestigious al-Azhar university in Cairo, recently wrote (Al-Musawwar – a mainstream Egyptian weekly, in Arabic - Aug. 23, 2002) in a rejoinder to an article of mine on Jihad (National Review Online, July 1, 2002), that the dar al-harb neverexisted, which implies then that neither jihad, nor slavery ever existed in Islam. Thus in one stroke of the pen, a reputable Islamic scholar summarily dismissed thirteen centuries of Islamic writings and laws on this subject.
Since the end of the 1960s some professors in Europe and North America teach that jihad wars produced no civilian victims, and that the Muslim armies of conquest were welcomed by their future dhimmis with open arms. This, of course, is the Muslim version of history and it is interesting to see that it is being adopted in Europe. This interpretation is in conformity with the shari’a which forbids any criticism of Islamic law or government, and attributes all evils to the mushrikun (the infidels), hence the necessity of the jihad, whose aim is to impose the Islamic law of justice over the land of Evil - the dar al-harb, the region of war.
It seems obvious that the Netherlands is submitting to Islam by having passed legislation to protect "religions" on the pretext of protecting believers from those who indulge in 'insulting of a group of people because of their race, their religion or belief,...." That legislation in Article 137c Dutch penal Code (See Note 1) is clearly aimed at protecting Islam.
The UN Is Submitting To Islam
The UN started submitting to Islam a long time ago - the Cairo Declaration is in fact a Proclamation of Jihad because it says nothing different than what Islam has been saying for 14 centuries - except it is all stated in comforting sounding, sophorific legalese.
So in the interests of what Mary Robinson, at that time of the UN, called "A greater need for an understanding of Islam..." the UN admitted the Cairo Declaration into its "Instruments" so affording acceptance and respectability effectively upon the right of Muslims to strive (jihad) with their wealth and their lives in Allah's path (Koran) - till all the world is ruled "in accordance with the Islamic Shari’ah" because "God made" the "islamic ummah" the "best nation"(Cairo Declaration - parroting what Islam is all about).
Adopted and Issued at the Nineteenth Islamic Conference of Foreign Ministers in Cairo on 5 August 1990.
The Member States of the Organization of the Islamic Conference,
Reaffirming the civilizing and historical role of the Islamic Ummah which God made the best nation that has given mankind a universal and well-balanced civilization in which harmony is established between this life and the hereafter and knowledge is combined with faith; and the role that this Ummah should play to guide a humanity confused by competing trends and ideologies and to provide solutions to the chronic problems of this materialistic civilization.
Wishing to contribute to the efforts of mankind to assert human rights, to protect man from exploitation and persecution, and to affirm his freedom and right to a dignified life in accordance with the Islamic Shari’ah
[…]
Article 24: All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Shari'ah.
Article 25: The Islamic Shari'ah is the only source of reference for the explanation or clarification to any of the articles of this Declaration.
So Islam Continues To Strive to Conquer and Rule The World with "Understanding" from the UN - Otherwise Believers Will Be Humiliated
So Islam can continue to strive with the UN's blessing to takeover and rule the world and strip "non-Muslims" of all legal rights and, if Allah so directs to the ruler of the day, plunder and steal property from "non-Muslims" because all the world is booty for the Islamic Ummah (see Islam and for instance Sura 9:29), all because this horror is Allah's will - and no one can criticise this because Islam's followers feelings will be hurt and the poor dears will be humiliated?
What About The Humiliation And Much, Much Worse of "Non-Muslims"?
What about the deliberate humbling and humiliation and persecution and murder and terror and rape and pillage of the victims of jihad, day in day out, year in year out, for fourteen hundred years?
Madness
What's going on in Holland is madness dressed up as sanity and Islam is being protected because the Sword of Islam demands that Islam be protected.
Geert Wilders Up Before A Semi-Shari'ah Court?
It appears that Geert Wilders is being hauled up before a Semi-Shari'ah Court of Semi-Islamic Shariah law in an Islamizing Netherlands, itself part of a rapidly Islamizing Eurabia, at present called the EU, otherwise known as Europe, on what seems to be the remote command of the World-Dictator-In-Waiting, the OIC.
It is that bad.
That is what we think.
We think that one day soon, the people of the Netherlands are going to pass extremely harsh judgement on those of their countrymen who are persecuting Geert Wilders, and that will include the judges if they convict him.
We think that the same kind of Tea Party Movement that unseated the Democrats in Massachusetts will turn against the hopeless government of the Netherlands except the Tea Party will not be so polite because the Islamization of the Netherlands and all of Europe has a growing number of people extremely concerned and upset.
Health Care is one thing. Terrorists another thing. An extreme left, it looks like, revolutionary government in the White House, is one thing.
But submission to the tender mercies of Islam is quite another.
If and when the people of Europe find out what their political leaders have done with their Political Correctness and their Crazed Multiculturalism and their willful disregard of what is after all the clearly stated law of Islam to conquer and rule the world, they are going to be very, very angry.
We believe they will find out.
Then what?
Geert Wilders is fighting for freedom, freedom for everybody.
Geert Wilders is a wonderful human being. He is our hero.
